Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Brayden Schnur vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schnur vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Brayden Schnur vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Schnur 1 - 0 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schnur has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schnur, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schnur has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schnur has won 30% of matches played (W/L 3/ 7), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schnur has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 11/ 17). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Schnur has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 2/ 5), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 38.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Schnur winning 1 times and Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Schnur winning 2 and Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Schnur and Ilkel was at the Bangalore Challenger, 15-11-2018, Quarterfinals, Hard with Brayden Schnur getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schnur and Ilkel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Schnur winning 0 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schnur winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schnur has played against opponents with an average rank of 306.4 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 224.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schnur has won 20% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schnur has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 40.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
887
Rank
92
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
412
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
52% (221-200)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-313)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$240,710
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Brayden Schnur | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:6:37 | 1:6:37 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (30/47) | 53% (31/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 83% (25/30) | 68% (21/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 88% (15/17) | 46% (13/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (25/59) | 15% (7/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Brayden Schnur
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
11
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
88%
(
15 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
7 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Brayden Schnur | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (9/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 39% (20/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (208/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 113 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 171.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (805/1413) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (566/805) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (284/608) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (38/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (479/1345) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (8/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Brayden Schnur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Brayden Schnur
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
8
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Skander Mansouri
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Clement Chidekh
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
57%
(
75 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
17
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
66 of
90)
60%
(
34 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
30%
(
40 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
136)
138
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(8) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Brayden Schnur
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
7
Aces
7
13
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(11) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Brayden Schnur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Brayden Schnur
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Maxime Cressy
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
7
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
19
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Schnur Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
